Research documentation · Experimental record
Communication loss / Transient

Rule-based reconfiguration

Transient communication loss evaluation

Fault: Communication loss
Duration: Transient
Recovery mechanism: Rule-based reconfiguration

Experiment definition

The experiment evaluates Rule-based reconfiguration under a transient communication loss injection. Fault onset is randomized between environment steps 40 and 60.

Experimental trajectory graphs

One representative seed (seed 0 of 8) per target × mode combination from the full sweep. See the Results page for the multi-seed aggregate comparison across mechanisms. The graphs for every seed are archived at doi:10.5281/zenodo.23304785 (files available from 10 November 2026).

Rule-based reconfiguration

Expected evaluation record:

MetricRecorded value
Degradation-area8.06 ± 2.27 (corrected; mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Safety-violation excess32.5 ± 8.6 (weighted, control-subtracted; mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Fraction of time healthy0.680 ± 0.022 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Relapse count0.50 ± 0.28 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
False-recovery rate0.000 ± 0.000 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Intervention recall1.000 ± 0.000 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)

Values are means with 95% confidence intervals across every target × duration-fixed combination shown on this page (see graphs below), 8 seeds each. See the Results page for the cross-mechanism comparison.

Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode)

Communication loss transient fault, Rule-based reconfiguration, Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode) - evaluation trajectory under transient communication loss (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.

Pressing Agent Target (stale mode)

Communication loss transient fault, Rule-based reconfiguration, Pressing Agent Target (stale mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Pressing Agent Target (stale mode) - evaluation trajectory under transient communication loss (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.

Rule-based detect

Expected evaluation record:

MetricRecorded value
Degradation-area0.00 ± 0.00 (corrected; mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Safety-violation excess0.0 ± 0.0 (weighted, control-subtracted; mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Fraction of time healthy0.672 ± 0.013 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Relapse count0.50 ± 0.28 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
False-recovery rate0.914 ± 0.055 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)
Intervention recall0.156 ± 0.101 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16)

Values are means with 95% confidence intervals across every target × duration-fixed combination shown on this page (see graphs below), 8 seeds each. See the Results page for the cross-mechanism comparison.

Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode)

Communication loss transient fault, Rule-based detect, Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode)
Rule-based detect - Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode) - evaluation trajectory under transient communication loss (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.

Pressing Agent Target (stale mode)

Communication loss transient fault, Rule-based detect, Pressing Agent Target (stale mode)
Rule-based detect - Pressing Agent Target (stale mode) - evaluation trajectory under transient communication loss (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.

Notes

This page is intentionally separated from the paper-facing results so that full-resolution plots, additional seeds, and diagnostic figures can be documented without overloading the publication.