The experiment evaluates Rule-based reconfiguration under a permanent byzantine / adversarial agents injection. Fault onset is randomized between environment steps 40 and 60.
Experimental trajectory graphs
One representative seed (seed 0 of 8) per target × mode combination from the full sweep. See the Results page for the multi-seed aggregate comparison across mechanisms. The graphs for every seed are archived at doi:10.5281/zenodo.23304785 (files available from 10 November 2026).
Rule-based reconfiguration
Expected evaluation record:
Metric
Recorded value
Degradation-area
18.26 ± 3.42 (corrected; mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Safety-violation excess
100.6 ± 19.3 (weighted, control-subtracted; mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Fraction of time healthy
0.622 ± 0.021 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Relapse count
0.17 ± 0.09 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
False-recovery rate
0.000 ± 0.000 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Intervention recall
1.000 ± 0.000 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Values are means with 95% confidence intervals across every target × duration-fixed combination shown on this page (see graphs below), 8 seeds each. See the Results page for the cross-mechanism comparison.
Sorting Agent Target (fixed malicious mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Sorting Agent Target (fixed malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Pressing Agent Target (fixed malicious mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Pressing Agent Target (fixed malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Both Agents Target (fixed malicious mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Both Agents Target (fixed malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Sorting Agent Target (random malicious mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Sorting Agent Target (random malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Pressing Agent Target (random malicious mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Pressing Agent Target (random malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Both Agents Target (random malicious mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Both Agents Target (random malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Sorting Agent Target (worst action mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Sorting Agent Target (worst action mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Pressing Agent Target (worst action mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Pressing Agent Target (worst action mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Both Agents Target (worst action mode)
Rule-based reconfiguration - Both Agents Target (worst action mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Rule-based detect
Expected evaluation record:
Metric
Recorded value
Degradation-area
43.02 ± 7.05 (corrected; mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Safety-violation excess
210.4 ± 42.3 (weighted, control-subtracted; mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Fraction of time healthy
0.409 ± 0.037 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Relapse count
0.21 ± 0.12 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
False-recovery rate
0.012 ± 0.006 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Intervention recall
0.565 ± 0.056 (mean ± 95% CI, n=72)
Values are means with 95% confidence intervals across every target × duration-fixed combination shown on this page (see graphs below), 8 seeds each. See the Results page for the cross-mechanism comparison.
Sorting Agent Target (fixed malicious mode)
Rule-based detect - Sorting Agent Target (fixed malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Pressing Agent Target (fixed malicious mode)
Rule-based detect - Pressing Agent Target (fixed malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Both Agents Target (fixed malicious mode)
Rule-based detect - Both Agents Target (fixed malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Sorting Agent Target (random malicious mode)
Rule-based detect - Sorting Agent Target (random malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Pressing Agent Target (random malicious mode)
Rule-based detect - Pressing Agent Target (random malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Both Agents Target (random malicious mode)
Rule-based detect - Both Agents Target (random malicious mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Sorting Agent Target (worst action mode)
Rule-based detect - Sorting Agent Target (worst action mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Pressing Agent Target (worst action mode)
Rule-based detect - Pressing Agent Target (worst action mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Both Agents Target (worst action mode)
Rule-based detect - Both Agents Target (worst action mode) - evaluation trajectory under permanent byzantine / adversarial agents (fault onset randomized between steps 40-60), seed 0 of the 8-seed sweep.
Notes
This page is intentionally separated from the paper-facing results so that full-resolution plots, additional seeds, and diagnostic figures can be documented without overloading the publication.
