LLM-agent replanning
Transient communication loss evaluation
Duration: Transient
Recovery mechanism: LLM-agent replanning
Experiment definition
The experiment evaluates LLM-agent replanning under a transient communication loss injection. Fault onset is randomized between environment steps 40 and 60.
Expected evaluation record
| Metric | Recorded value |
|---|---|
| Degradation-area | 0.41 ± 0.87 (corrected; mean ± 95% CI, n=16) |
| Safety-violation excess | 1.8 ± 3.9 (weighted, control-subtracted; mean ± 95% CI, n=16) |
| Fraction of time healthy | 0.624 ± 0.050 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16) |
| Relapse count | 0.50 ± 0.28 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16) |
| False-recovery rate | 0.860 ± 0.093 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16) |
| Intervention recall | 0.331 ± 0.212 (mean ± 95% CI, n=16) |
Values are means with 95% confidence intervals across every target × duration-fixed combination shown on this page (see graphs below), 8 seeds each. See the Results page for the cross-mechanism comparison.
Experimental trajectory graphs
One representative seed (seed 0 of 8) per target × mode combination from the full sweep. See the Results page for the multi-seed aggregate comparison across mechanisms. The graphs for every seed are archived at doi:10.5281/zenodo.23304785 (files available from 10 November 2026).
Pressing Agent Target (blackout mode)
Pressing Agent Target (stale mode)
Notes
This page is intentionally separated from the paper-facing results so that full-resolution plots, additional seeds, and diagnostic figures can be documented without overloading the publication.